Legal Opinion
United States v. Pearson
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 28, 1945No. 4892PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELSH, District Judge.
This is a proceeding in contempt. The plaintiff petitioned for a rule to show cause why the defendant, Seward Pearson, should not be punished for contempt. Pursuant to an order awarding a rule in contempt and order to show cause, several hearings were •had.
A restraining order was entered herein on the 13th day of April, 1944, and a final decree on the 29th day of April, 1944, whereby said defendant was enjoined and restrained from continuing construction of, and from doing any act whatsoever which contributed to the completion of that certain construction project located…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. HoffmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1925
- In Re SylvesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930
- South Butte Mining Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
- In re Presentment by Grand Jury of StetserDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1942
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. RossDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- In Re John C. McClure Appeal of Earl Swicegood, Aurin Dale LittleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971