Legal Opinion
United States v. Hoffman
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 14, 1925No. 5179PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
W.1LKERSON, District Judge.
Respondents were cited to show cause why they should not be punished for misbehavior as officers of this court in thoir official transactions, and for disobedience of the writs and commands of this court in the cases of United States v. Terrence Druggan and United Stales v. Frank Lake. They answered the rule, and the issues made and the evidence adduced thereunder have been presented to and heard by the court.
Druggan and Jjako were found guilty, on July 11, 1924, of violating an injunction issued by this court'in a suit under the National Prohibition law, and were…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Proudfit Loose Leaf Co. v. Kalamazoo Loose Leaf Binder Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- United States v. HuttoSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Randolph v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Henderson v. DudleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- James E. McCall v. C. L. Swain, Superintendent, Lorton ReformatoryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Gant v. ManessMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
- United States v. PersonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1963
- Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.