Legal Opinion

In Re Sylvester

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 10, 1930PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWoolsey, J.

This petition is denied in respect of both the forms of relief sought, except that a technical contempt on the part of both Mr. Sylvester and Mr. Lynch is found, and they ■are both hereby reprimanded.

'The facts on which this unusual application is based are as follows:

On September 6, 1929, Paul Rabkin and Sol Rubman were arraigned before a United States commissioner charged with conspiring to smuggle merchandise into the United States without payment of duty. They were held for the grand .jury, and bail was fixed at $5,000 for each of them. On giving bail they were both released. Before the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. United States v. MarescaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
  3. Spirou v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  4. E. Ingraham Co. v. GermanowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  5. Ulmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. SmythDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
  2. Nat Yanish v. Bruce G. Barber, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. Land v. Dollar Sawyer, Secretary of Commerce v. DollarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  4. American Optical Company v. Rayex CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  5. Land v. DollarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API