Panushka v. Panushka
Oregon Supreme Court
1DissentO’Connell, J.
Inasmuch as OES 93.240 provides that the surviving spouse is entitled to the unpaid purchase money under circumstances such as we have here, the rule adopted by the majority of the court will not affect future transactions. But the rule does apply to all past land sale contracts executed by husband and wife where provision has not been made for the right to the proceeds upon the death of one of the sellers. Undoubtedly there are many such contracts and the injustice which will be worked by the rule adopted by the court is likely to be felt by a substantial number of our citizens. For this…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stout v. Van ZanteOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Detroit & Security Trust Co. v. KramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Erickson v. EricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Sands v. Church of the Ascension & Prince of PeaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- Manning v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.