Legal Opinion
Moix-McNutt v. Brown
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided May 9, 2002No. 01-283PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TOM GLAZE, Justice.
This case involves the application of the statute of limitations in legal malpractice cases. We take jurisdiction under Ark. Sup. Ct. R. l-2(a)(5), as the appeal involves the discipline of attorneys-at-law.
Ramona Moix-McNutt originally hired the law firm of Crockett and Brown, PLLC, 1 in December of 1996 to represent her and her husband in a real estate transaction, and on January 2, 1997, Crockett and Brown filed a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy petition for Moix-McNutt. After a hearing in June of 1997, the bankruptcy court found that Moix-McNutt did not have enough income to meet…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chapman v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- O'MARA v. DykemaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Goldsby v. FairleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Ford's Inc. v. Russell Brown & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Ragar v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Rice v. RagsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
- Bryan v. City of CotterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Gerber Products Company v. Mitchell Williams Selig GatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Kelley v. USAA Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.