Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Alexander

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 28, 1991No. 91-33PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

In June of 1986, Hubert Alexander, an attorney, represented Jerry Chapman in the sale of a business. In July of 1990, more than three (3) years after the sale had been completed, Chapman-sued Alexander for an alleged act of legal malpractice which occurred at the time of the sale. Chapman did not allege Alexander concealed the negligent act. Alexander pleaded the statute of limitations as a bar to the action. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Alexander. We affirm the summary judgment.

Since 1877, it has been our rule that the statute of limitations…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lane v. LaneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Ford's Inc. v. Russell Brown & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Stroud v. RyanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Riggs v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. White v. ReaganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Adams v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Goldsby v. FairleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. R.D.H. Communications, Ltd. v. WinstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Chamberlin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Rice v. RagsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API