Legal Opinion

Bryant v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1979No. 578 S 85PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRENTICE, Justice.

At the outset, we observe that the defendant’s preparation of the record does not conform to the requirements of our appellate rules. Counsel is referred to the State’s answer brief for a more detailed and wholly justified critique. We would be warranted in dismissing or affirming, as urged by the State, for what does not qualify as a “good faith attempt at compliance.” Only our concern for the defendant’s appellate rights has motivated us to review this case, at the expense of substantial judicial time which more careful preparation by counsel would and should have averted.

A…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. United States v. William N. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  4. Emerson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Tungate v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Lindley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Daniels v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Gilmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Bean v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Barnes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API