Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VARTABEDIAN, Acting P. J.
This case concerns the extent of insurance coverage provided under an “additional insured” endorsement to a commercial general liability policy. The trial court held the policy covers the additional insured for the factual circumstances presented here as constituting “liability arising out of’ the work of the named insured. At issue are (1) whether the notice of appeal was timely filed and (2) whether Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) is covered by the additional insured endorsement obtained by the named insured of Fireman’s Fund Insurance Companies (FFIC),…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- La Jolla Beach & Tennis Club, Inc. v. Industrial Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- MRI Healthcare Center of Glendale, Inc. v. State Farm General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. American Dynasty Surplus Lines InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Forecast Homes, Inc. v. Steadfast InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- A.F. Lusi Construction, Inc. v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Frontier Pacific InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.