T. H. Symington & Son, Inc. v. Symington Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
In this case the plaintiff has made a motion to retax the costs. The case was the usual patent infringement suit in equity. Plaintiff’s patent, narrowly construed, was held valid, but not infringed. (D. C.) 9 F. Supp. 699. The patent related to springs for railway cars. In the decree dismissing the bill the costs were awarded to the defendant. The defendant’s cost bill as taxed by the clerk includes the cost of making about twenty-five models illustrating the construction of the various parts of spring assemblies of various types used in railway cars; also illustrating…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- The BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Henkel v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Guardian Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- William C. Euler v. Nancy Lee Waller, a Minor, by Her Guardian, Robert Lewis McCollarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Kenyon v. Automatic Instrument Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1950
- W. F. & John Barnes Co. v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Swan Carburetor Co. v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Gotz v. Universal Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.