Legal Opinion
Tresler Oil Co. v. Champlin Petroleum Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 22, 1982No. C-1-78-781PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO TRANSFER
SPIEGEL, District Judge.
This case came for consideration of defendant’s motion for transfer or stay (doc. 62), plaintiff’s memorandum in opposition (doc. 68) and defendant’s reply memorandum (doc. 69). For the reasons set forth below we find that defendant’s motion to transfer should be granted.
This is -an action to recover alleged price overcharges, treble damages, consequential damages and attorney fees resulting from sales of gasoline, kerosene and fuel oil made by the defendant, Champlin Petroleum Company (Champlin) to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Mercury Motor Express, Inc. v. Norman C. BrinkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Associated General Contractors of America, Inc. v. Laborers International Union of North AmericaTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1973
- Dyke v. Gulf Oil Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1979
- ARTISAN DEVELOP., DIV. OF KAISER AETNA v. Mountain States Develop. Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clark Oil Co., Inc. v. Texaco Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985