Legal Opinion
ARTISAN DEVELOP., DIV. OF KAISER AETNA v. Mountain States Develop. Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 30, 1975No. C-1-74-516PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DAVID S. PORTER, District Judge.
This matter is before us on the motion of defendant, Mountain States Development Corporation (Mountain States), to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Northern Division, under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Plaintiff, Artisan Development (Artisan), Division of Kaiser Aetna, filed a memorandum contra (doc. 10) to which defendant replied (doc. 16). The various submissions were supported by numerous affidavits and the cause subsequently came on for oral argument before this Court.
We note briefly, by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Nicol v. Koscinski, U.S. Dist. JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
- Fannin v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Stearns-Roger, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- St. Joe Paper Co. v. Mullins Manufacturing Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sky Technology Partners, LLC v. Midwest Research InstituteDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Priess v. FisherfolkDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
- Neff Athletic Lettering Co. v. WaltersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
- AMF, INC. v. Computer Automation, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
- DeMoss v. First Artists Production Co., Ltd.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.