Legal Opinion
Dillon Co. v. Continental Supply Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 27, 1938No. 1577PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Circuit Judge.
On August 25, 1927, S. V. Dillon of Tulsa, Oklahoma, filed application for a patent of a device which he represented as new and useful improvements in pipe joints, and said in his specification that it would be constructed and arranged in such manner that the pipe gripped thereby will be positively prevented from slipping in either direction; that it provided a method of coupling pipes in either a rigid or flexible joint as different conditions may require. He said his invention was illustrated in accompanyng drawings. On January 20, 1931, patent No. 1,789,379 was issued…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- National Malleable Castings Co. v. Buckeye, Malleable Iron & Coupler Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- Henry v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
- Anakin Lock Works v. Dillon Lock WorksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Rich v. Baldwin, Tuthill & BoltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Haynes Stellite Co. v. Osage Metal Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Scott & Williams, Inc. v. WhisnantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- Banning v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1974
- Rountree v. Varco International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1978
- CS&M, Inc. v. Covington Bros. TechnologiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.