Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1994No. 19007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

The Department of Revenue notified petitioner that his privileges of operating a motor vehicle were being suspended because he was arrested upon probable cause to believe he was driving a motor vehicle while the alcohol concentration in his blood or breath was ten-hundredths of one percent or more by weight of alcohol in his blood. See § 302.505, RSMo Supp.1993. He sought trial de novo under § 302.535, RSMo 1986, of an administrative decision upholding the suspension. Following trial and a decision adverse to him, petitioner appeals.

Review of this nonjury case is under Rule…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schranz v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Stewart v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. Robinson v. Estate of RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Thomas v. DepaoliMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. McClanahan v. Deere & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mayberry v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Frank v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API