Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Depaoli

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 25, 1989No. 16035PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLSTEIN, Chief Judge.

Defendants Lino and Ñola B. Depaoli and plaintiffs Jim and Laura Thomas and John and Virginia Pratt all own residential property in Woodcliffe Subdivision in Greene County. Defendants appeal an adverse judgment ordering the removal and enjoining maintenance of a six-foot high privacy fence constructed closer than sixty feet to the front of a lot they own. The Depaolis claim the trial court’s judgment erroneously failed to give strict construction to language in a restrictive covenant. We affirm.

The original owners and developers of the subdivision were Allen and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Prudential Property & Casualty Ins. Co. v. ColeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Graves v. StewartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. Himmel v. HendlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  4. Dierberg v. WillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Conley v. Crown Coach CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lakes at Mercer Island Homeowners Ass'n v. WitrakCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  2. Speedie Food Mart, Inc. v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Burden v. BurdenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Crow v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Behen v. ElliottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API