Legal Opinion

United States v. Pruitt

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 4, 1998No. Nos. 95-5983, 95-6393, 96-5222, 96-6026 and 96-6337PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

The five defendants in these consolidated appeals, Tobias M. Pruitt, Cory D. Evans, John Herbert Talley, Michael Clay, and Kel-cey Tramayne Kendrick, raise a number of challenges to their respective convictions and sentences. The defendants were part of a drug conspiracy involving the sale of crack cocaine. Pruitt, Evans, Clay, and Kendrick pleaded guilty. In light of Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995), all four of these defendants’ convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) for carrying or using a firearm during and in relation…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. United States v. Samuel Demont BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Benjamin Y. Owusu (98-3356), Larry Latham (98-3847), and Anthony Latham (98-3850)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. JerossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Manuel Hernandez (98-1239/2298), Oscar Solis (99-1616)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API