Legal Opinion

Bellingham Bay Improvement Co. v. City of New Whatcom

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1898No. 2894PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Whatcom County.—Hon. Hiram E. Hadley, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

This was a proceeding originally instituted before the city council of the city of Hew .Whatcom, for the purpose of re-assessing property claimed to have been benefited by an alleged improvement. The appellant appeared and filed objections to the proposed re-assessment in so far as the same affected its property. The objections were overruled and appeal was taken to the superior court, the judgment there being in favor of the re-assessment. Erom such judgment an appeal is taken to this court. It is the first and main contention of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hawthorn v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Eastman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Wilkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Ross v. IrvingIllinois Supreme Court · 1852

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Batty v. Arizona State Dental BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State ex rel. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Railroad CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Twin Falls Canal Co. v. HuffIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Sanderlin v. LukenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  5. Potter v. City of WhatcomWashington Supreme Court · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API