Marriott v. Hawk
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
We shall first inquire whether the court has any evidence before' it to review. The defendants in error claim that there was no bill of exceptions taken in the Court of Appeals and none filed in this court. If such is the case, the court can consider no errors predicated on the alleged bill of exceptions. Section 11564, General Code; Townsend v. Harrison, 58 Ohio St., 398, 50 N. E., 985.
The contention of defendants in error upon this point is borne out by the printed record. The bill of exceptions, so called, is the transcript of the evidence taken in the court of common pleas…
2Cited by5 opinions
- DeMoss v. Conart Motor Sales, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1948
- Knowlson v. BellmanOhio Supreme Court · 1953
- Seright v. Zinn, TrusteeOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Hertzer v. SchulerOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- State ex rel. Tempero v. ColopyOhio Supreme Court · 1962