Legal Opinion

DeMoss v. Conart Motor Sales, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1948No. 31126PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

It is disclosed' that no bill of ex ceptions was allowed and signed by the Court of Appeals, and it does not appear that a bill of exceptions was even prepared and presented to that court.

This court, therefore, has before it only the pleadings and the journal entry showing the finding and decree of the Court of Appeals.

The alleged contract is not disclosed by the pleadings.

The printed record filed in this court is apparently a transcript of the evidence adduced in the Court of Common Pleas and presumably the case was presented to the Court of Appeals upon that transcript although…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marriott v. HawkOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Micklethwait v. City of PortsmouthOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Detroit, Toledo Ironton Rd. Co. v. BlaumOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Schlarb v. HartwellOhio Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matter of BossonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
  2. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. SchindelmanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
  3. Viering v. Scott.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Gerrick v. GorsuchOhio Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Kelley v. Creston Buick Sales Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API