Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Tempero v. Colopy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1962No. 37228Published

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, J.

Since there is no bill of exceptions, this court does not know what evidence was presented to the Court of Appeals. Hence, the only question before this court is whether the petition states a cause of action. See State, ex rel. Moffit, v. Zupnik (1943), 142 Ohio St., 232, 51 N. E. (2d), 661; Viering v. Scott (1949), 152 Ohio St., 211, 88 N. E. (2d), 921; Marriott v. Hawk (1924), 111 Ohio St., 285, 145 N. E., 287.

A court has no jurisdiction to render a personal judgment against a defendant (such as is sought by respondent Moreland against relator in the aforementioned action in the Common…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Jaster v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Marriott v. HawkOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Viering v. Scott.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. State Ex Rel. Moffitt v. ZupnikOhio Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API