Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of San Jose

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 21, 2023No. 5:21-cv-01849Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KYLE JOHNSON, Case No. 21-cv-01849-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ 9 v. DAUBERT MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY OF ROGER 10 CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., CLARK AND DR. HARLAN WATKINS Defendants. Re: ECF Nos. 110, 112 11 12 13 Pending before the Court are two motions (the “Motions”) filed by Defendants City of San 14 Jose (the “City”) and Officer James Adgar (“Officer Adgar,” and with the City, “Defendants”) to 15 exclude expert testimony of Plaintiff Kyle Johnson’s (“Mr.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API