Legal Opinion
Rose v. U.S. Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 15, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-2199Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) RICHARD W. ROSE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 18-cv-2199 (TSC) ) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, appearing pro se, challenges the alleged refusal of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (“ATF”) to expedite his request for documents under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”). The Department of Justice, of which ATF is a component, has moved for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, ECF No. 10. For the reasons explained below, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Military Audit Project, Felice D. Cohen, Morton H. Halperin v. William Casey, Director of Central IntelligenceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Brown v. CalifanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
- United States Department of Justice v. Tax AnalystsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Waterhouse v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.