Dieter v. Crossmark

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MARY DIETER, Plaintiff, 8:24CV169 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CROSSMARK, and WIS INTERNATIONAL, Defendants. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Complaint. Filing No. 1. Plaintiff, a non-prisoner proceeding pro se, has been given leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). See Filing No. 6. The Court will now conduct an initial review of Plaintiff’s claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). I. SUMMARY OF COMPLAINT Plaintiff worked for Defendant Crossmark and its parent company, Defendant Wis International, as an “event…