Los Angeles City Water Co. v. City of Los Angeles
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California
In Equity. On exceptions and demurrers to original and supplemental bills.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit in equity, the chief object of which is the annulment of an ordinance adopted by the defendant city on the 26 th day of February, 1900, establishing the rates at which the complainant shall furnish water to its consumers. To the bill certain exceptions were filed by the defendant, as, also, a demurrer. Subsequently a supplemental bill was filed by the complainant, to which certain consumers of the water within the city were also made parties; and they, together with the defendant city, filed certain exceptions to the supplemental bill, as well as a demurrer…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- New Orleans v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. City of Arkansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cohasset Water Co. v. Town of CohassetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Texas Gas Utilities Co. v. City of UvaldeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- City of Pocatello v. MurrayIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
- Riverside & A. Ry. Co. v. City of RiversideU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1902
- Davis & Farnum Mfg. Co. v. City of Los AngelesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1902