Legal Opinion
Riverside & A. Ry. Co. v. City of Riverside
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California
Decided November 1, 1902No. 1,000PublishedCited by 6 opinions
In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction and demurrer to bill.'
1Opinion of the Court
WELLBORN, District Judge.
Complainant and the city of Riverside are corporations organized and existing under the laws of California, the latter being a municipal corporation of the sixth class. The other defendants are also citizens of said state.
On December 6, 1895, said city, as party of the first part, and the Redlands Electric Light & Power Company, as party of the second part, entered into a contract, whereby they agreed, among other things, quoting from the contract:
“That the said party of the second part will furnish and deliver to said party of the first part, at the shafts of one or…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Scott v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Healy v. RattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Elliott v. Empire Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Holmes v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- City of Denver v. Mercantile Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Des Moines City Ry. Co. v. City of Des MoinesU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.