Legal Opinion
McClellan v. Coffin
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1884No. 9934PublishedCited by 8 opinions
From the Wayne Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
— It is alleged in appellant’s complaint that he executed to Charles H. Coffin several instruments payable in painting; that to secure the performance of these contracts he executed a mortgage to him; ^that contemporaneously with *457the execution of these instruments, Charles H. Coffin executed to appellant the following instrument:
“Richmond, Ind., Sept. 29, 1877.
“ Whereas Theodore McClellan has this day purchased of me lot 14, in C. F. Price’s second addition to Richmond, and has given his notes in payment therefor for $550 in painting at ten, eighteen and twenty-five cents per yard, I hereby…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kortright v. . CadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Caruthers v. HumphreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
- Moynahan v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Chrisman v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
- Leach v. LeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sawyer v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Gadbury v. Ohio & Indiana Consolidated Natural & Illuminating Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
- McFarland v. ChristoffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950
- Knollenberg v. NixonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Phillips v. GREEN STREET CORP.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.