Bell v. Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MARION F. EDWARDS, Judge.
|Jn this protracted litigation involving employment agreements, non-compete and non-solicitation of customers and employee clauses, Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. of Louisiana (“Rimkus”) appeals a judgment of the trial court that entered summary judgment in favor of Gary Bell, Nick Cam-marata, and Mike DeHarde, dismissing Rimkus’ reconventional demands with prejudice. Rimkus appeals that decision. For reasons that follow, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiffs/appellees, Gary Bell (“Bell”), Nick Cammarata (“Cammarata”), and Mike DeHarde (“DeHarde”), were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Canovsky v. GehrsenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. CammarataDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Bell v. RIMKUS CONSULT. GROUP, INC. OF LA.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
- Bell v. RIMKUS CONSULTING GROUP, INC. OF LOUISIANALouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Bell v. Rimkus Consulting Group, 2009-0329 (La. 4/24/09)Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Boros v. LobellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015