Legal Opinion

Bell v. Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 25, 2010No. 10-CA-80PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MARION F. EDWARDS, Judge.

|Jn this protracted litigation involving employment agreements, non-compete and non-solicitation of customers and employee clauses, Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. of Louisiana (“Rimkus”) appeals a judgment of the trial court that entered summary judgment in favor of Gary Bell, Nick Cam-marata, and Mike DeHarde, dismissing Rimkus’ reconventional demands with prejudice. Rimkus appeals that decision. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiffs/appellees, Gary Bell (“Bell”), Nick Cammarata (“Cammarata”), and Mike DeHarde (“DeHarde”), were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Canovsky v. GehrsenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. CammarataDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
  3. Bell v. RIMKUS CONSULT. GROUP, INC. OF LA.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Bell v. RIMKUS CONSULTING GROUP, INC. OF LOUISIANALouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Bell v. Rimkus Consulting Group, 2009-0329 (La. 4/24/09)Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boros v. LobellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API