Legal Opinion
Bell v. RIMKUS CONSULTING GROUP, INC. OF LOUISIANA
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 13, 2009No. 08-CA-491PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GREG G. GUIDRY, Judge.
|2The Defendants, Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. and Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. of Louisiana, appeals a judgment denying their motion for a preliminary and permanent injunction in a case involving employment agreements containing non-competition and non-solicitation of customers and employees clauses (the agreements.) We affirm.
The Plaintiffs, Gary Bell, Nick Cammar-ata, and Mike DeHarde, worked for the Defendants as forensic engineers. As part of their employment, the Plaintiffs signed the agreements at issue here.
In the fall of 2006, the Plaintiffs resigned from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. BondSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Kimball v. Anesthesia SpecialistsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc. v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- Bell v. RIMKUS CONSULT. GROUP, INC. OF LA.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
- H2O Hair, Inc. v. MarquetteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- USI Insurance Services, LLC v. TappelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Bell v. Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Brown & Root Industrial Services, LLC v. Anthony E. Farris, Jr., Kevin D. Steed, and Fides Consulting, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024