Legal Opinion

Lynteq, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided June 17, 1991No. Court 90-04-00175PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TSOUCALAS, Judge:

The instant action, designated a test case, comes before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (1988), seeking reclassification of certain imported merchandise. Plaintiff, Lynteq, Inc. (“Lynteq”), challenges the United States Customs Service’s (“Customs”) classification of its imports of Cromophyl-L, a natural coloring agent obtained from ground marigold flower petals, under subheading 3203.00.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedules of the United States (“HTSUS”), a basket provision covering coloring matter of vegetable or animal origin not specially provided for,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Tomoegawa USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  5. Austin Chemical Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  2. Avecia, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API