Legal Opinion

Carrasco v. Udall, Kansas, City of

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided February 22, 2022No. 6:20-cv-01322Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS EMILIO CARRASCO, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 20-1322-EFM CITY OF UDALL, KANSAS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Emilio Carrasco alleges that employees of Defendant City of Udall, Kansas (the “City”) improperly cut down and removed six cedar trees from the west side of his property. Carrasco brings this action under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

asserting that his Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights have been violated. He seeks damages from the loss of the trees and diminished property value. This matter comes before the Court on the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. Argo v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API