Farmers Mutual Fire Ass'n v. Steed
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action on insurance policy; from Murray superior court—Judge Fite. August 17, 1916.
1Opinion of the CourtBioodworth, J.
1. The trial judge unequivocally approved the brief of evidence in the following language: “The within brief of evidence approved, the same being correct.” The fact that the court added, that “Counsel for plaintiff [in] error objects, but it is ordered that copy of policy be incorporated in brief of evidence,” does not in any manner qualify its approval; and inasmuch as the material portions of the contract of insurance, including the “Mercantile Stock Form,” were set out in the ap*330proved brief of evidence, the last clause of the order approving the brief of evidence may be treated as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Southern Fire Insurance v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. EllingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Graham v. Niagara Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Everett-Ridley-Ragan Co. v. Traders InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Finleyson Bros. v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance v. FranklinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Nalley v. Hanover Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Clark v. Fire Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance v. FranklinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.