Legal Opinion
Arrow, Edelstein & Gross, P.C. v. Rosco Productions, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 29, 1984No. 81 Civ. 5471 (JMC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANNELLA, District Judge:
After a nonjury trial on the merits, the Court finds for plaintiff in part.
Defendants’ motion for a directed verdict is denied. Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(a).
FACTS
Plaintiff, Arrow, Edelstein & Gross, P.C., a New York law firm, seeks attorneys’ fees for services allegedly rendered to musicians Gary Rossington [“Rossington”] and Allen Collins [“Collins”]. Rossington and Collins contend that although plaintiff rendered the alleged services, they are not individually liable because the services were not rendered to them individually but, rather, were rendered to the three Florida…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Salzman Sign Co. v. BeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Nick C. Spanos v. Skouras Theatres Corporation, Theatre & Cinema, Inc., Philhamboro, Inc., Youngstown Theatre Corporation and Modern Playhouses, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kramer, Levin, Nessen, Kamin & Frankel v. AronoffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Aries Ventures Ltd. v. Axa Finance S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Port Chester Electrical Construction Corp. v. HBE Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991