Legal Opinion

Hardt v. Levy

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1894No. 72PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by William A. Hardt and others against Moses S. Levy, impleaded. From an order requiring the receiver to account, and refusing to vacate the order by which he was appointed, defendant Moses S. Levy appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

We held at the October term of 1893 (25 IT. Y. Supp. 248) that, while an action by the general creditors of a firm for the appointment of a receiver and the disposition of its assets is maintainable against a limited partnership, it is not against a general partnership; that the record disclosed the existence of a general, and not a limited, partnership by and between these defendants; and reversed the judgment .which the special term had granted to the plaintiffs. The suit was commenced May 18, 1891, by the service of summons and complaint on the defendant Augustus H. Levy. On the same day…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Rubber Products, Inc. v. Twin Highway Tire Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Davenport National Bank v. DitmarWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Hardt v. LevyNew York Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API