United States Rubber Products, Inc. v. Twin Highway Tire Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed November 7, 1939:
Fritz, J.
The appellant, Solberg, contends that, at the outset of the supplementary proceedings involved herein, the court commissioner had no power to entertain the proceed ings or to appoint a receiver under the existing circumstances. That contention is predicated on the following grounds: (1) That the execution and sheriff’s return afforded no basis for supplementary proceedings, because the execution had not been countersigned by the owner of the judgment or his attorney as prescribed by provisions in sec. 272.05, Stats., and the sheriff…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wright v. . NostrandNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Marling v. FitzGeraldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Smeesters v. SchroederWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Blair v. Illinois Steel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Greeley v. Provident Savings BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Candee v. EganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Racine Unified School District v. Service Employees' International Union, Local 152Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- Nick v. HoltzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941