Legal Opinion

Davenport National Bank v. Ditmar

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1925No. 19102. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

In January, 1922, the Davenport National Bank commenced an action at law against Josephine Ditmar to recover a judgment in the sum of $10,846 on a promissory note then overdue. At the same time, a showing was made that she was heavily in debt, threatened with a number of suits at the instance of creditors; that she was without means or credit that were necessary to conserve her property and to prepare her large farming property for seeding and cultivation in order to meet and reduce her obligations. The court was asked to appoint a receiver. One was appointed, and the defendant in her duly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Greeley v. Provident Savings BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. Hardt v. LevyNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Rubber Products, Inc. v. Twin Highway Tire Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Ganoung v. Chinto Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API