Legal Opinion

In re Deimer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1948PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVaughan, J.

This is an appeal from so much of an order of the Onondaga Special Term, entered February 13, 1948, as awards the respondent, Driscoll, Mathews & Gingold the sum of $1,000 for legal services rendered the above-named incompetent veteran from the year 1940, up to and including January 21, 1948. The proceeding came before the Special *558Term, not upon the petition of the committee of the incompetent, but upon the petition of the incompetent himself. The appeal was submitted, without argument. Carl R. Gray, Jr., as Administrator of Veterans’ Affairs, is the appellant.

We are of the opinion that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carter v. . BeckwithNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. In Re the Accounting of DoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of GordonNew York Supreme Court · 1922
  4. In re the Estate of BrownNew York Surrogate's Court · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re McCormickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Shatsky v. Sea Gate Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. In re Theodore T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. In re the Probate of the Will of ThomsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  5. In re BermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API