In re the Probate of the Will of Thoms
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: It appears without question that Janet Thoms Ingersoll, the pseudo-appellant, was declared incompetent to manage herself and her affairs by a court of competent jurisdiction in May, 1944, and that a committee was duly appointed. No claim is made that there has ever been an order declaring competency or restoration to the incompetent of her property and the management thereof. The Surrogate could do nothing but dismiss the petition of said adjudged incompetent. She was without authority or right to institute the proceeding (Matter of Deimer, 274 App. Div. 557) and the attorneys…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Estate of BrownNew York Surrogate's Court · 1926
- In re DeimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cottrell v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Shatsky v. Sea Gate Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- In re AhoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974