Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Will of Thoms

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: It appears without question that Janet Thoms Ingersoll, the pseudo-appellant, was declared incompetent to manage herself and her affairs by a court of competent jurisdiction in May, 1944, and that a committee was duly appointed. No claim is made that there has ever been an order declaring competency or restoration to the incompetent of her property and the management thereof. The Surrogate could do nothing but dismiss the petition of said adjudged incompetent. She was without authority or right to institute the proceeding (Matter of Deimer, 274 App. Div. 557) and the attorneys…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BrownNew York Surrogate's Court · 1926
  2. In re DeimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cottrell v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  2. Shatsky v. Sea Gate Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. In re AhoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API