Matter of Cheney Bros. v. Joroco Dresses, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The restrictions upon customers, forbidding their using the Cheney Brothers name in resales, promised to be imposed by the petitioner, according to the uncontradicted proof, had reference to 40-inch printed radium cloth and none other. In all contracts made by the petitioner for the sale of such fabrics the restrictions promised were invariably imposed. No restrictions, as to resales of 36-inch printed Bivulay or 40-inch printed satin crepe, were imposed in the contracts made for the sales thereof. It is undisputed, however, that 40-inch printed radium cloth is a wholly different fabric from…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- In Re the Arbitration Between Weinrott & CarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Lummus Company v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Company, Inc., (Three Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
- In Re the Arbitration Between Behrens & FeuerringNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.