Legal Opinion

Smith v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 11, 1957No. 5-1162PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sam Robinson, Associate Justice.

The issue here is the validity of a purported will. On February 15, 1953, Harvey J. Nelson executed a typewritten instrument which he doubtless intended to be his will. The document, however, does not meet the requirements of the law so as to constitute it a valid will. Only one witness signed the instrument. Ark. Stats. § 60-104. Subsequent to Nelson’s death, the purported typewritten will was offered for probate, but probate was denied because of the invalidity of the document as a will. Later, the same purported will, along with two letters written by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cartwright v. CartwrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  2. Stark v. StarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  3. Johnson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Faith v. SingletonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Chambers v. YounesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  3. Edmundson v. Estate of FountainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  4. McDonald v. PettySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  5. Odom v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API