Smith v. Nelson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Sam Robinson, Associate Justice.
The issue here is the validity of a purported will. On February 15, 1953, Harvey J. Nelson executed a typewritten instrument which he doubtless intended to be his will. The document, however, does not meet the requirements of the law so as to constitute it a valid will. Only one witness signed the instrument. Ark. Stats. § 60-104. Subsequent to Nelson’s death, the purported typewritten will was offered for probate, but probate was denied because of the invalidity of the document as a will. Later, the same purported will, along with two letters written by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cartwright v. CartwrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Stark v. StarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Johnson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
3Cited by8 opinions
- Faith v. SingletonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Chambers v. YounesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Edmundson v. Estate of FountainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- McDonald v. PettySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Odom v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.