Legal Opinion

Edmundson v. Estate of Fountain

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 1, 2004No. 03-1459PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

Appellant Sharon Kay Edstiappeals ce. of the Izard County Circuit Court denying her petition to probate a purported holographic will written by her mother Oral W. Fountain. On appeal, she argues that the issue of whether the will contains words of testamentary intent is only one factor to be reviewed in determining if the will is valid. This case is before us on a petition for review from an unpublished court of appeals’ opinion in Edmondston [Edmundson] v. Estate of Oral W. Fountain, No. CA02-842 (Ark. App. Dec. 10, 2003)1; hence, our jurisdiction is pursuant to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lewellyn v. LewellynSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Dillard v. NixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Amant v. CallahanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Matter of Estate of O'DonnellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Faith v. SingletonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Estates of McKnight v. Bank of America, N.A.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Kidwell v. RhewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Minton v. MintonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  4. Bell v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Duke v. ShinpaughCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API