Legal Opinion

Morris v. . Cleve

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 14, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

This case was before us at the Spring Term, 1927, and is reported in 193 N. C., 389. Within ten days after the receipt of the certificate from this Court, sustaining the demurrer interposed by the present appealing defendants, the plaintiff, after due notice, moved for leave to amend the complaint under C. S., 515. (See, also, C. S., 546, and annotations thereunder.) This motion was allowed, and from the order permitting plaintiff to file an amended complaint the defendants, D. W. Cleve and W. A. Oleve, appeal, assigning error in said ruling. The appeal must be dismissed as premature, since…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Goodwin v. Caraleigh Phosphate & Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. Parker v. . HardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Morris v. . CleveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morris v. . CleveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Hood, Comr. of Banks v. . Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. State v. . ClarkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Pardue v. Charlotte Motor Speedway, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API