Legal Opinion

State v. . Clarke

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 24, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.

It will be noted that the order of Judge Nettles from which appeal is taken simply “refuses to strike out the forfeiture heretofore entered in this cause.” This is in no wise a final judgment, and in no way affects a substantial right which could not be protected upon an appeal from a final judgment, and therefore the appeal is premature and should be dismissed. The proper procedure was to note an exception and appeal from the final judgment, if adverse to the defendants. Morris v. Cleve, 194 N. C., 202, 139 S. E., 230; Smith v. Matthews, 203 N. C., 218, 165 S. E., 350; N. C. Prac. & Proc.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Morgan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Smith v. . MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Morris v. . CleveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. . WigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API