State Ex Rel. Johnson & Johnson Corp. v. Karl
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Chief Justice:
In this action invoking the original jurisdiction of this Court in prohibition, a drug manufacturer asks this Court to adopt the learned intermediary doctrine as an exception to the general duty of manufacturers to warn consumers of the dangerous propensi*465ties of their products.1 After thorough consideration of the learned intermediary doctrine in light of the current state of the prescription drug industry and physician/patient relationships, we decline to adopt this doctrine. Accordingly, the requested writ of prohibition is denied.
I
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hoover v. BergerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Charolette Payne v. Novartis Pharm. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Lance v. WyethSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Stevens v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
- Amanda Watts v. Medicis Pharmaceutical CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- Centocor, Inc. v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.