Keller v. District Lodge No. 19, International Ass'n of MacHinists Workers
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending are the Defendant’s motions for partial summary judgment based on the statute of limitations and for summary judgment on the merits based on the duty of fair representation. For reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on claims barred by the statute of limitations is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Further, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the merits is GRANTED.
I
A principal purpose of summary judgment is to isolate and dispose of meritless litigation. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 324, 106…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Scott ex rel. McNeely v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
- Linville v. UNITED AUTO WORKERS OF AMERICADistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2006