Legal Opinion

Keller v. District Lodge No. 19, International Ass'n of MacHinists Workers

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided April 18, 1995No. Civ. A. 3:94-0137PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

Pending are the Defendant’s motions for partial summary judgment based on the statute of limitations and for summary judgment on the merits based on the duty of fair representation. For reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on claims barred by the statute of limitations is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Further, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the merits is GRANTED.

I

A principal purpose of summary judgment is to isolate and dispose of meritless litigation. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 324, 106…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Scott ex rel. McNeely v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
  2. Linville v. UNITED AUTO WORKERS OF AMERICADistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API