Legal Opinion

Globe Indemnity Co. v. Daviess

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 28, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Affirming.

Mrs. Inez Daviess brought this suit against the Globe Indemnity Company to recover on a policy indemnifying her in the sum of $1,000 against loss by burglary, robbery, theft, or larceny of jewelry and other personal property. In the policy schedule — “statements made by the assured” — the company’s local agent wrote the words, “No exceptions,” after each of the following questions:

“10. The Assured has not sustained any loss' or damage nor received nor claimed indemnity for any loss or damage by burglary, theft or robbery at the premises covered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. RollCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. Proctor v. RayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Robertson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. Osborne v. Unigard Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986
  3. Chamberlain v. National Life & Accident Ins.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. Pence Mortgage Co. v. StokesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
  5. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. JewellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API