Legal Opinion
William D. Seymour & Co. v. Castell
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 4, 1926No. Nos. 27583, 27622PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion to Dismiss.
ST. PAUL, J.
On July 31, 1925, one of the defendants herein was allowed a suspensive appeal, returnable to this court on September 28th.
On September 28th he obtained an extension of the return day to October 28th.
On October 29th he filed the transcript of appeal m this court.
On October 31st appellee moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the transcript had been filed (one day) too late.
I
In Landry v. Le Boeuf & Sons, 153 La. 31, 95 So. 391, this court said:
“It is well settled that the three days of grace allowed for the filing of a transcript of appeal,- or for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- J. S. Terry Const. Co. v. James K. Sutherlin Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- Landry v. T. Le Boeuf & SonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
3Cited by14 opinions
- Meadow Brook National Bank v. RecileDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
- Central Bank of Bingham v. PerkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Landis Construction Co. v. Health Education AuthoritySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Gibson v. G. Dounson, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Fletcher v. CrichtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.