Legal Opinion

Landry v. T. Le Boeuf & Sons

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 29, 1922No. 25374PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, J.

The appellee has moved to dismiss this appeal because the transcript was not, filed until the return day had expired. The appeal was made returnable on or before the 30th of May, 1922. On the 31st of May, 1922, the appellants obtained an order from this court, extending the return day to the 15th of June, 1922. The transcript was filed on the 16th of June, 1922. .

It is well settled that the three days of grace allowed for the filing of a transcript of appeal, or for obtaining an extension or postponement of the return day, do not apply again when the return day has once been extended or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hudson v. GarrettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
  2. Wood & Roane v. WoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
  3. J. S. Terry Const. Co. v. James K. Sutherlin Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  4. Bienvenu v. Factors' & Traders' Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1876
  5. Lacroix v. BoninSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. William D. Seymour & Co. v. CastellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Aaron v. MizerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. In Re Gem Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  4. Dent v. DentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  5. Gibson v. G. Dounson, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API