Tate Engineering, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
This case comes before the court on plaintiff’s exceptions to a -recommended decision filed August 1, 1972, by Trial Commissioner Joseph V. Colaianni pursuant to Rule 134(h). The court has considered the case on the briefs and oral -argument of counsel. Since the court agrees with the decision, as -hereinafter set forth, it hereby affirms and adopts the same as the basis for its judgment in this case. Therefore, it is concluded that plaintiff is not entitled to recover and the petition-is dismissed.
OPINION OP COMMISSIONER
Colaianni, Commissioner: This is a patent suit under 28…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Lindemann Maschinenfabrik Gmbh v. American Hoist and Derrick Company, Harris Press and Shear Division, Commercial Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Structural Rubber Products Company v. Park Rubber Company and International Metals and MacHines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Lewmar Marine, Inc. v. Barient, Inc. And Barlow Marine, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.