Legal Opinion

Hollandsworth v. Nebraska Partners

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 2000No. S-00-044PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

In this appeal, we address whether the payment of a court-approved lump-sum settlement in a workers’ compensation case is subject to a waiting-period penalty under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-125 (Reissue 1998). The appellee, William R. Hollandsworth, and the appellant, Nebraska Partners, doing business as Mead Cattle Company, Inc., entered into a settlement agreement, which was approved by a single judge of the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court. Nebraska Partners did not deliver the settlement check to Hollandsworth within 30 days of the order approving the settlement, and the same judge awarded…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Miller v. E.M.C. Insurance CompaniesNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Torres v. Aulick Leasing, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Musil v. J.A. Baldwin Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Roth v. Sarpy County Highway DepartmentNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dawes v. Wittrock Sandblasting & Painting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Holdsworth v. Greenwood Famers Co-opNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Tilt-Up Concrete, Inc. v. Star City/Federal, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Hagelstein v. Swift-Eckrich Division of ConAgraNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Russell v. StrickerNebraska Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API