Legal Opinion

City of North Charleston v. Claxton

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 17, 1993No. 2013PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Judge:

The City of North Charleston (the City) commenced a condemnation proceeding against landowners Janie and William Claxton (the Claxtons). The Claxtons requested a jury trial to determine the value of the condemned property. The jury returned a verdict for the Claxtons for $79,500. The City made a motion for new trial nisi and the Claxtons moved for an award of attorney fees. The trial judge denied the motion for new trial and awarded the Claxtons $17,654.15 in attorney fees. Both parties appeal. We affirm.

FACTS

In 1985 Centre Pointe announced plans for a private 394-acre…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Blumberg v. Nealco, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Creative Displays, Inc. v. South Carolina Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  4. Collins v. CollinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  5. South Carolina State Highway Department v. Carodale AssociatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brockbank v. Best Capital Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. City of Folly Beach v. Atlantic House Properties, Ltd.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Normandy Corp. v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  4. South Carolina Department of Transportation v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. In re: Carroll D. BrownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API