Legal Opinion

Garratt v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 11, 1996No. CA A90817Published

1Per curiam

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision establishing conditions of parole, including a declaration that petitioner is a predatory sex offender. ORS 181.585 to ORS 181.589.

Most of Petitioner’s arguments are resolved contrary to his position by our decisions in Schuch v. Board of Parole, 139 Or App 327, 912 P2d 403, rev den 324 Or 78 (1996), and Gress v. Board of Parole, 143 Or App 7, 924 P2d 329, on recons 144 Or App 375, 927 P2d 138 (1996). Petitioner also argues that the Board erred in including as a condition of his parole that he not have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gress v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Gress v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Schuch v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API